Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorReplies
-
Johnny Yuma
Participant::Hearing Next Week on Clinton Foundation ‘Pay-To-Play’ Allegations Will Include 6,000 Pages of Whistleblower Documents
It’s flown a little under the radar because every news outlet is focused on Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen and whether or not there was collusion with Russia or a campaign finance violation on the part of the Trump campaign, but there’s a hearing scheduled next week into the ongoing investigation into the Clinton Foundation.
And when the hearing opens, House Congressional members will have before them “6,000 pages of evidence attached to a whistleblower submission filed secretly more than a year ago with the IRS and FBI.”
In a 48-page, secret submission filed with the IRS and the FBI back in 2017, whistleblowers offered 95 exhibits, including internal legal reviews, that have “flagged serious concerns about legal compliance, improper commingling of personal and charity business and “quid pro quo” promises made to donors while Hillary Clinton was secretary of State,” reports The Hill.
December 10, 2018 at 05:35 in reply to: Donald Trump listed as unindicted co-conspirator in Cohen sentencing memo: analysis #5915Participant::Comey: Trump ‘Close,’ But ‘Not Quite’ Unindicted Co-Conspirator
President Donald Trump isn’t an unindicted co-conspirator in former lawyer Michael Cohen’s crimes “in the formal sense,” former FBI Director James Comey said Sunday.
Read Newsmax: Comey: Trump ‘Close,’ But ‘Not Quite’ Unindicted Co-Conspirator | Newsmax.com
Urgent: Do you approve of Pres. Trump? Vote Here in PollDecember 10, 2018 at 05:23 in reply to: CRIMINAL ACT: Democrat Ocasio-Cortez Broke 42 US Code § 1983 #5914ParticipantParticipantParticipantParticipantParticipant::Hillary Clinton’s use of private email server among ‘gravest’ offenses to transparency, judge says A conservative group won a court victory this week when a federal judge ordered more fact-finding in the Hillary Clinton email investigation. In his ruling Thursday, U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth assailed Clinton’s use of a private email server while secretary of state as “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.” https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hillary-clintons-use-of-private-email-server-among-gravest-offenses-to-transparency-judge-says
Getting desperate? Hillary’s non issue has been investigated already and case is closed. The only criminal on the loose right now is the orange piece of racist garbage. And his criminal family. ROTFLMAO
I guess the case is only closed in your mind because a federal judge just ordered more fact-finding in the Hillary Clinton email investigation…
December 9, 2018 at 06:32 in reply to: CRIMINAL ACT: Democrat Ocasio-Cortez Broke 42 US Code § 1983 #5864Participant::This Democrat is as stupid as whale dung…
Ocasio-Cortez has become infamous for her many gaffes about government and politics. On Friday, there were calls for a House Ethics investigation after the congresswoman-elect threatened to subpoena Donald Trump Jr. over a meme mocking socialism.
In November, Ocasio-Cortez mixed up the three branches of government, asserting that, “If we work our butts off to make sure that we take back all three chambers of Congress, uh, rather, all three chambers of government — the presidency, the Senate and the House — in 2020.”
ParticipantDecember 8, 2018 at 16:42 in reply to: CRIMINAL ACT: Democrat Ocasio-Cortez Broke 42 US Code § 1983 #5835ParticipantDecember 8, 2018 at 15:58 in reply to: CRIMINAL ACT: Democrat Ocasio-Cortez Broke 42 US Code § 1983 #5832Participant::According to — 42 U.S. Code § 1983 – Civil action for deprivation of rights Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia. (R.S. § 1979; Pub. L. 96–170, § 1, Dec. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 1284; Pub. L. 104–317, title III, § 309(c), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3853.)
It looks like you and other pieces of shit trumptards are very scared if you have to suggest this is a violation of law. If indeed you’re so worried about what someone says being a threat then you need to start with Trump and the assholes he has brought to Washington, including his family.
Threatening a private citizen with a Congressional subpoena because he made a meme you don’t like is one hell of a hot take.
Participant::I am out on several US websites, both lefty and righty…….and no matter what the subject is on for discussion, there is so much hate from both sides, vile hateful name calling……..we have forums here in Sweden but here is never hate and vile on them like in the USA
Liberals do not play nice so they generate hate…
December 8, 2018 at 06:29 in reply to: CRIMINAL ACT: Democrat Ocasio-Cortez Broke 42 US Code § 1983 #5811Participant::According to — 42 U.S. Code § 1983 – Civil action for deprivation of rights
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
(R.S. § 1979; Pub. L. 96–170, § 1, Dec. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 1284; Pub. L. 104–317, title III, § 309(c), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3853.)
ParticipantParticipantParticipantParticipant::There are childish minds at work on this thread, but considering the sources it is no surprise.
Don’t you just love how they jerk each other off?
Participant::None of the presidents except for this piece of garbage pretending to be president think that getting killed in action or getting captured makes one a loser.
Opinions are like the anus, everyone has one…
Participant::Bone And Joint Medical Disqualifications from Militar.
Many people want to join the U.S. Military. However, there are several medical concerning bones and joints that can prevent people from doing so. In fact, the list is quite long of medical conditions that automatically disqualify you from military service and many of these issues will prevent a large number of military recruits from fully entering the service. Many of these ailments can be excused with a waiver depending upon the circumstances, but waivers are typically on a case by case basis. Many depend upon the injury or defect, but also the technological advances in surgical repairs.
The causes for rejection for appointment, enlistment, and induction (without an approved waiver) are an authenticated history of:
https://www.thebalancecareers.com/military-medical-standards-for-enlistment-and-appointment-3354020
Why weren’t Clinton and Obama drafted into the military?
Obama was 12 years old by the time the draft ended.
Hillary Clinton is a woman, and thus draft exempt.
Bill Clinton received deferments based on preferential treatment towards students pursuing advanced degrees and through superior personal planning avoided the draft.
So, Clinton wasn’t drafted because he went to extraordinary lengths to avoid the draft. There’s no denying that.
Participant::
Cool. A CinC deserves that.
The difference is three of these presidents were officers in the military and one pussy that didn’t serve…
-
AuthorReplies
