The man child lashes out at Chief Justice Roberts

[Capricorn]

Up

0

Down

::

Everyday it is something or the other with this unstable childish racist piece of shit. Totally unfit to be the president of United States.

Sorry Chief Justice John Roberts, but you do indeed have “Obama judges,” and they have a much different point of view than the people who are charged with the safety of our country. It would be great if the 9th Circuit was indeed an “independent judiciary,” but if it is why……

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 21, 2018

" All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force. " — George Orwell.

Topic

[Patriot]

Up

0

Down

::

Trump was right. The 9th Circuit is a judicial nightmare.

[Desert_Fox]

Up

0

Down

::

Patriot wrote:

Trump was right. The 9th Circuit is a judicial nightmare.

Or a defender of the Constitution, but then I guess that is a nightmare for you and Trump.

". . . those who claim to know the Mind of God, who will tell you what God thinks and how He will judge and condemn others—those people are the greatest of all blasphemers." Aloysius Xingu Leng Pendergast

[Capricorn]

Up

1

Down

::

Patriot wrote:

Trump was right. The 9th Circuit is a judicial nightmare.

Is he ever wrong according to you?

By the way, U.S. District Court Judge Jon S. Tigar in San Francisco is not part of the 9th Circuit. Trump as usual lied and falsified as usual.

And the Trump should stop attacking our democratic institutions, don’t you agree? And this is why Justice Roberts intervened and provided the rare rebuttal.

His predecessors never attacked our justice system like this fraudulent wannabe fascist does.

" All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force. " — George Orwell.

[Patriot]

Up

0

Down

::

Capricorn wrote:

Mark wrote:

Trump was right. The 9th Circuit is a judicial nightmare.

Is he ever wrong according to you? By the way, U.S. District Court Judge Jon S. Tigar in San Francisco is not part of the 9th Circuit. Trump as usual lied and falsified as usual. And the Trump should stop attacking our democratic institutions, don’t you agree? And this is why Justice Roberts intervened and provided the rare rebuttal. His predecessors never attacked our justice system like this fraudulent wannabe fascist does.

He most certainly is in the 9th Circuit, which carries a 79% reversal rate (3rd highest).

• This reply was modified 4 years, 6 months ago by Patriot.
• This reply was modified 4 years, 6 months ago by Patriot.

[Capricorn]

Up

0

Down

::

Patriot wrote:

Capricorn wrote:

Mark wrote:

Trump was right. The 9th Circuit is a judicial nightmare.

Is he ever wrong according to you? By the way, U.S. District Court Judge Jon S. Tigar in San Francisco is not part of the 9th Circuit. Trump as usual lied and falsified as usual. And the Trump should stop attacking our democratic institutions, don’t you agree? And this is why Justice Roberts intervened and provided the rare rebuttal. His predecessors never attacked our justice system like this fraudulent wannabe fascist does.

He most certainly is in the 9th Circuit, which carries a 79% reversal rate (3rd highest).

That is falsifying information in many ways.

It is not that 79% of 9th Circuit decisions that get reversed. It is 79% of appeals to the decisions and that too which the US Supreme Court accepts to be valid case to appeal (which is a small part of the 9th circuit decisions) which get reversed. Got it?

" All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force. " — George Orwell.

[Capricorn]

Up

0

Down

::

Tigar is not a judge on the 9th Circuit. He is a district court judge who sits in San Francisco. And as NPR reported:

“… the Ninth Circuit, which encompasses much of the western United States, has not yet been asked to rule on [Tigar’s] decision. Tigar’s decision is also temporary, lasting only until Dec. 19 when the judge is scheduled to hear arguments about whether the order should remain permanent.

https://www.npr.org/2018/11/22/670248789/trump-resumes-spat-with-roberts-calls-9th-circuit-a-complete-total-disaster?utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=news

 

" All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force. " — George Orwell.

[Patriot]

Up

0

Down

::

Three 9th Circuit jackasses decided to stymie the President’s intent to protect the border from invasion by illegals. Activist judges all.

The Courts have no role to play on asylum matters: These are matters for Congress and the Attorney General.  Read the law: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1158

Federal judge blocks Trump asylum restrictions
NOVEMBER 20, 2018 03:08:15 PM
Zachary Uram
A judge for the US District Court for the Northern District of California on Monday temporarily blocked a Trump administration rule to deny asylum to migrants who illegally cross the southern border into the US, saying the policy likely violates federal law on asylum eligibility.

On November 9, the Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice jointly submitted a rule to the Federal Register.

The interim rule, if applied to a proclamation suspending the entry of aliens who cross the southern border unlawfully, would bar such aliens from eligibility for asylum and thereby channel inadmissible aliens to ports of entry, where such aliens could seek to enter and would be processed in an orderly and controlled manner.
This regulation would limit the number of undocumented immigrants that could apply for asylum, but they would still be able to apply for Convention Against Torture protection.

The judge ruled that the issued regulation directly conflicted with the text of 8 USC § 1158(a)(1) in restricting asylum to a port of entry.

The rule barring asylum for immigrants who enter the country outside a port of entry irreconcilably conflicts with the INA and the expressed intent of Congress. Whatever the scope of the President’s authority, he may not rewrite the immigration laws to impose a condition that Congress has expressly forbidden.
The regulation is temporarily blocked until December 18.

https://www.jurist.org/news/2018/11/federal-judge-blocks-trump-asylum-restrictions/

 

8 USC § 1158(a)(1)

(3)Limitation on judicial review

No court shall have jurisdiction to review any determination of the Attorney General under paragraph (2).

[Capricorn]

Up

0

Down

::

The courts interpret the law so the judiciary has that power to stop the xenophobic racist, and his draconian and unconstitutional violation of international law with regards to refugees and asylum seekers.
Unless Congress legislates that asylum seeking is illegal according to US laws, the racist so called president is violating US laws and international agreements US has signed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asylum_in_the_United_States

• This reply was modified 4 years, 6 months ago by Capricorn.

" All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force. " — George Orwell.

[Patriot]

Up

0

Down

::

What did the invaders lawsuit say? https://www.scribd.com/document/393132413/Migrant-Caravan-Class-Action#from_embed

What exactly did Judge Tiger say in his order?https://www.dropbox.com/s/b1dyry63c5lvbj4/43%20Order%20Granting%20TRO.pdf?dl=0

I read both of them, word for word.

 

 

 

[Patriot]

Up

0

Down

::

I’ll tell what Judge Tiger ruled in one sentence:

Once any person actually enters the US they are entitled to claim asylum and the US must deal with it.

Bravo! Like most lawyers he takes a simple and obvious truth and bloviates until you almost can not understand what they say or write.

Congress can change the law easily and quickly and thereafter Judges have no voice.

[Capricorn]

Up

0

Down

::

So stop blaming the judiciary for correctly interpreting the law.
Let Congress change laws.

" All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force. " — George Orwell.

[Patriot]

Up

0

Down

::

Capricorn wrote:

So stop blaming the judiciary for correctly interpreting the law. Let Congress change laws.

 

So what did the good judge accomplish? He told us what everybody already knew.

All he may get credit for is that it is important that they don’t cross the border.

If they do you can count on the vast majority will see their asylum request rejected and they will then be deported.

Grandstanding activist judges should be neutered with a rusty razor blade.

[Capricorn]

Up

0

Down

::

Patriot wrote:

Capricorn wrote:

So stop blaming the judiciary for correctly interpreting the law. Let Congress change laws.

So what did the good judge accomplish? He told us what everybody already knew.

If he told us what everyone knew, why is Trump attacking him?

" All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force. " — George Orwell.

[Patriot]

Up

0

Down

::

How about another attention seeking activist piece of shit on the feral bench:

 

 

A federal judge dismissed criminal charges against two doctors in a landmark female genital mutilation case and ruled that Congress “overstepped its bounds” by passing a law banning the procedure.

The case centered on two Michigan doctors and six others charged last year in connection with arranging to perform female genital mutilation on nine girls, four from Michigan and five of whom were brought to the state from Illinois and Minnesota.

While female genital mutilation has been a federal crime in the United States for more than two decades, the Michigan doctors were the first to be charged under the law. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement touted the indictments at the time, saying the charges “will hopefully deal a critical blow to stamping out this inhumane practice.”

But on Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Bernard Friedman found the federal ban unconstitutional, ruling that, among other reasons, female genital mutilation is a “local criminal activity” that must be regulated by the states, not Congress.

….

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/social-issues/judge-rules-that-federal-law-banning-female-genital-mutilation-is-unconstitutional/2018/11/21/a9455728-edd2-11e8-96d4-0d23f2aaad09_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.96f9d4a58dd3

 

[Patriot]

Up

0

Down

::

Federal administration of abortion is constitutional, but FGM is not? Go figure.

[Capricorn]

Up

0

Down

::

What an adult wants to do to their own body as their independent choice should be nobody’s business.
The key thing here is that it should be without any coercion.
And doctors should have a choice not to perform FMG on medical grounds.
But if there are women stupid enough to mutilate their body, it is their own shitty choice.

But I even think suicide should be allowed to be carried out by willing doctors if a patient wants to end their life.

• This reply was modified 4 years, 6 months ago by Capricorn.

" All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force. " — George Orwell.

[Patriot]

Up

0

Down

::

Capricorn wrote:

What an adult wants to do to their own body as their independent choice should be nobody’s business. The key thing here is that it should be without any coercion.

The you agree that Muslim-American parents should go to prison if and when they drag their daughters to a cutter?

 

[Desert_Fox]

Up

0

Down

::

Mark, do you have a book that tells you the stupidest conclusion you could come to from what someone posts or do you do that strictly on your own?

". . . those who claim to know the Mind of God, who will tell you what God thinks and how He will judge and condemn others—those people are the greatest of all blasphemers." Aloysius Xingu Leng Pendergast

[Patriot]

Up

0

Down

::

” … four mothers who were accused of bringing their daughters to the clinic for the procedure.”

Adult parents brought their daughters to the cutter. Know what you are talking about so you can stop embarrassing yourself.

[Patriot]

Up

0

Down

::

As Judge Tiger pointed out, no request for asylum is valid if they are on the Mexican side of the border.

“The Trump administration has won the support of Mexico’s incoming government for a plan to remake U.S. border policy by requiring asylum seekers to wait in Mexico while their claims move through U.S. courts, according to Mexican officials and senior members of President-elect Andrés Manuel López Obrador’s transition team.”

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-united-states-mexico-asylum-20181124-story.html

• This reply was modified 4 years, 6 months ago by Patriot.

[Author]

Replies