'Four Pinocchios': Benson Calls Out Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton
-
Never Trust A Democrat…
‘Four Pinocchios’: Benson Calls Out Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton for ‘Debunked Smear’ of Kavanaugh
Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) was called out this week over a misleading Twitter video featuring a statement from Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.
In her tweet, which has since been rated “false” by fact-checking website Politifact and The Washington Post, Harris claimed that the 11-second clip proved Kavanaugh wants to “[take] away a woman’s constitutionally protected right to make her own health care decisions.”
http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/09/14/kamala-harris-hillary-clinton-make-false-claim-about-kavanaugh-birth-control
-
Did Kavanaugh explicitly state his position on Roe v. Wade?
" All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force. " — George Orwell.
On the rare occasion that a Democrat proves to be in the wrong Harpo has a shit fit and ignores the dozens upon dozens of times that Republicans in Congress lie like a dog on the porch, not to mention that Trump couldn’t speak the truth if it were served to him on a silver platter.
Seems a tiny bit hypocritical to me.
". . . those who claim to know the Mind of God, who will tell you what God thinks and how He will judge and condemn others—those people are the greatest of all blasphemers." Aloysius Xingu Leng Pendergast
Roe v. Wade is the best compromise on how to deal with abortion. I doubt that we will ever see it reversed or replaced.
Roe v. Wade is the best compromise on how to deal with abortion. I doubt that we will ever see it reversed or replaced.
Kavanaugh thinks otherwise if this article is true:
https://theintercept.com/2018/09/14/facebook-weekly-standard-suppressed-a-story-about-brett-kavanaughs-opposition-to-roe-v-wade-were-republishing-it/
We don’t have to guess, however, whether Judge Kavanaugh thinks that a constitutional right to abortion is grounded in this Glucksberg test, because he’s already answered that question. As law professor Jim Oleske points out on Twitter, Kavanaugh said in his 2017 speech to the conservative American Enterprise Institute that “even a first-year law student could tell you that the Glucksberg’s approach to unenumerated rights was not consistent with the approach of the abortion cases such as Roe vs. Wade in 1973, as well as the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe, known as Planned Parenthood vs. Casey.”
So, to spell this all out, Kavanaugh believes that the way to determine whether the Constitution protects a particular unenumerated right is to apply the test the Supreme Court laid out in Glucksberg. And the judge also thinks that “even a first-year law student could tell you” that Roe is inconsistent with Glucksberg.
" All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force. " — George Orwell.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
.
